Over 59426

Nse Politics


TAGS: conservatives scared of antichrist obama
Rating: 3.23/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

jsorocki - November 8, 2012, 9:58 am
I find your lack of creativity suspicious. Also, the spelling of your name.
Cannabal - November 7, 2012, 6:01 pm
I find your lack of coffee in the morning suspicious.
crankyhead - November 7, 2012, 5:26 pm
...only to have to turn around and go back to the trailer park in Tennesee, or whatever.
crankyhead - November 7, 2012, 5:26 pm
Well once they get here, we're going to have to explain to them that we already have a succesful socialized healthcare system, and we allow g** marriage, and all that stuff they hate. I just don't want them wasting all that gas money coming here...
Bull - November 7, 2012, 1:49 pm
I find your grasp of sarcasm lacking.
jsorocki - November 7, 2012, 8:35 am
I find your lack of intelligence appalling.
romneyisatool - November 7, 2012, 12:54 am
They are cleaning up the remains on the sidewalk outside his two story bedroom window... funny, though, not much brain matter to clean up
Cannabal - November 7, 2012, 12:50 am
Simultaneous aneurysms? If so, why the hell wasn't Battaile affected? Oh, and Crankyhead: my condolences, them Teabaggers will take a while to realize their mistake, but who knows: they might be able to find Canada anyway.
romneyisatool - November 7, 2012, 12:43 am
Notice, Cranky, how much quieter and cleaner it is in here after an Obama victory? WTFO, arnnatz, groucho, Vbunchalies, Jdolt.... we hardly knew ya? hahaha
crankyhead - November 7, 2012, 12:34 am
Please don't.

CONGRESS - Must be great to be able to vote on your own salary and tax rate.

DR. CONSERVATIVE - Bringing truths to the people.

The NRA -

a congress of baboons -

FISHING - conservatives teach you how to fish liberals take your fish and give it to someone unwilling to fish

How Conservatives in America see President Obama -

TAGS: obama racism conservatives bias demotivational
Rating: 3.43/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

inflatedego - November 23, 2017, 8:43 am
Poor Grouchofauxnewsmarxists and probably a few other nicks here...
GrouchoMarxists - November 23, 2017, 2:11 am
..Kidding. No bad blood, dude.. Humoring my stalker..
GrouchoMarxists - November 23, 2017, 1:42 am
...Yeah, you heard the man. Come out and face the music, fauxnews. You can't run from the KGB forever, Englishman.
inflatedego - November 23, 2017, 1:32 am
Fauxnews... why you running?
inflatedego - November 22, 2017, 10:24 pm
Any reason your troll a** can't post at the cube Grouchofauxnewsmarxists?
GrouchoMarxists - November 22, 2017, 10:08 pm
..Oh. You were just trolling me. My bad.. -changes the channel- Didn't realize I was watching g*y p*rn.
inflatedego - November 22, 2017, 8:50 pm
Some of your best work Grouchofauxnewsmarxists
inflatedego - November 21, 2017, 2:28 pm
https://youtu.be/dSGm8Xspjzg Show do loves dem non negro dialects
0TC - November 21, 2017, 2:10 pm
hi faux. Been awhile. Pretty cold winter here. How's that global warming been working out for you, chicken little?
inflatedego - November 21, 2017, 8:00 am
Dan Rather observed that obama couldn't sell watermelons
GrouchoMarxists - November 21, 2017, 2:13 am
Kidding.. Later dude..
GrouchoMarxists - November 21, 2017, 2:12 am
..Long time no see, faux. Did you just wake from a coma?
fauxnews - November 21, 2017, 2:00 am
"I have spent the last few months recovering from a leg injury so that I can return to duty overseas." LOLOLOL!!! Didn't realize he was one of 'The Expendables.'{X>D My, my, my...how the mighty have fallen. Sorry,couldn't resist. Good bye everyone! Cheers
inflatedego - November 21, 2017, 12:02 am
Have a tissue... Where have I heard that remark before?
GrouchoMarxists - November 20, 2017, 6:34 pm
(cont.)This meme. Sorry again
fauxnews - June 6, 2014, 11:15 am
/apparently too 'h o t' for the word filter..lol
fauxnews - June 6, 2014, 11:15 am
On the h** list. Heck yeah! X-D
EmmaRoydes - June 6, 2014, 8:10 am
Research shows that, if you are afraid of spiders, you're more likely to find one in your own bedroom
fckoffmooooooo - June 6, 2014, 1:02 am
A link to a racist article full of lies posted by a racist liar.. Color me surprised
fckoffmooooooo - June 6, 2014, 1:00 am
Talking about your mother now, racebaiter.. Does she spit or s******?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - June 6, 2014, 12:43 am

So, So easy. How can you possibly call me a racist?
fckoffmoooooo - June 6, 2014, 12:38 am
You're too easy mooo.. Grab your knee pads, race-baiter.. You need them.. spending all that time on your knees with your racist buddies..
fauxnews - June 6, 2014, 12:13 am
/a***yzed = a n a l y z e d (really? "Nal" is considered a 'bad' word? Now that f***ing funny)
fauxnews - June 6, 2014, 12:12 am
Anyhow..lol..for anyone interested,Im posting a link to a great article about "race in code" as a***yzed by a review of a famous documentary in hindsight,"2016:Obama's America" http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/08/30/what-an-obama-bashing-doc-says-about-us/
Mooooooooooooooooooo - June 6, 2014, 12:01 am

Really? You're making this too easy.
guest31 - June 5, 2014, 11:50 pm
I'd have a difficult time posting lies too. Much less calling others racists.. unless they were the authors of crap like this
fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 11:36 pm
No worries. :-) I struggled with it too, tell you the truth.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - June 5, 2014, 11:30 pm

The reality here is, I had a hard time deciding whether or not to approve this poster. Faux, you're right on the line of what I consider acceptable with this one. Don't push it any further.
fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 11:25 pm
And just so you know, Fox...I'm actually sad to hear that you are getting ready to leave us,sincerely. :-( Sorry to hear about your injury... :-/ ... hope you're doing better.If I was there I'd buy you a bottle of the good stuff.Be safe when you return,k?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - June 5, 2014, 11:24 pm

Goodbye Groucho
Mooooooooooooooooooo - June 5, 2014, 11:23 pm

Don't taunt him.
GrouchoMarxist - June 5, 2014, 11:23 pm
Glad to see you approve of this moron's racist poster that he subscribes to us.. Your every bit of the impotent moderator I knew you could be. Now if that's too strong for you mooo.. Perhaps you need to change your tampon... Have a nice day, racist
fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 11:22 pm
Hmmmm, Groucho...you called me a "Moron" and then an "Idiot". Two personal attacks for the price of one? X-D Here...have another tissue...didn't realize how badly you needed it until now.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - June 5, 2014, 11:21 pm

I'm going to let you have that one...but JUST that one.
GrouchoMarxist - June 5, 2014, 11:20 pm
Or why not just admit you're a complete idiot with no defense with the president... What's running for now that he has to continually campaign vs lead..
Mooooooooooooooooooo - June 5, 2014, 11:20 pm

Insults like "moron" and "idiot" against other members will not be tolerated. keep it up and you'll be banned. (you've had your first 2 strikes)
fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 11:19 pm
No...they are all warriors...even those cowardly men who attacked their former comrade for political gain. And despite that, I would still buy any of those men a couple of rounds..because all men who serve are warriors, even if they screw up later in life
GrouchoMarxist - June 5, 2014, 11:18 pm
Or light skinned with no negro dialect...
foxrecon19d - June 5, 2014, 11:18 pm
No, faux. You are going to face facts. You created a poster depicting Obama in a way that Democrats actually see Obama. Then tried to blame your own bigotry on Republicans.
GrouchoMarxist - June 5, 2014, 11:18 pm
Why didn't you make him clean and articulate?
GrouchoMarxist - June 5, 2014, 11:17 pm
You do what you want moron... You made the racist poster... As for Kerry you're an idiot too
foxrecon19d - June 5, 2014, 11:14 pm
So, faux, according to you, the ONLY warrior in the swift boat community was John Kerry... because that is what the Democrst narrative says...And anyone who thinks differently is part of the lunatic fringe. The Democrst narrative. Interesting world
fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 11:14 pm
I'm going to look the other way and pretend you didn't just refer to "slavery as a failed experiment" and that what you really meant was something here ENTIRELY different. Care to clarify? :-/
fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 11:12 pm
"Face it, the experiment to use a black man to enslave has failed"...WTF? Uh, this is when I normally say, can I have a hit of whatever your smoking??? Must be good stuff :-)
fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 11:11 pm
Why should I do that Groucho, when you do enough of that for all of us combined? X-D Tissue?
foxrecon19d - June 5, 2014, 11:10 pm
Ah, the specter of the real problem lifts its ugly head: liberal Democrats attempting to blame their blatant racism and bigotry on the party that fought to free slaves and pass civil rights. Face it, the experiment to use a black man to enslave has failed
fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 11:10 pm
Whateva...No....I didn't call "you a terrorist." You and I both know that. That's a straight up stupid question. You did, however, call me "a liberal".....again. I did make fun of your "us against them" logic. By your logic, you are making fun of yourself
GrouchoMarxist - June 5, 2014, 11:07 pm
Does yo masta and Miss Hillary tahk funny when thea audience is different too? You really show your stupidity and racism here...
fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 11:07 pm
P.S. Nobody in the Pentagon is calling swift boaters REAL warriors. In fact, they have been denounced by the majority of respected mainstream conservatives and veterans everywhere. Only the lunatic fringe, a small minority, thinks them as "warriors"...
foxrecon19d - June 5, 2014, 11:05 pm
And faux. Did you actually call mr a terrorist? I have spent the last few months recovering from a leg injury so that I can return to duty overseas. I have done that. So, yes, I guess to people like you I am a terrorist
fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 11:05 pm
Attacking GOP politicians isn't the same thing as an endorsement of the left. Nor is it praising liberals. Nothing in this poster says, "OBAMA ROCKS! HE'S AWESOME!!" Ah, the specter of the real problem lifts its ugly head: partisan politics & divisiveness
foxrecon19d - June 5, 2014, 11:02 pm
The Democrat narrative says he is a war hero. The real warriors who were there say otherwise. I am not refuting the poster. I am endorsing it as how folks like you actually see Obama. Or did a conservative Republican make this pister, hmmmm?
fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 10:57 pm
There you go again... so instead of attacking the poster, you attack (full of rage) the author. Can't refute the poster so go after the source, eh? According to your logic, Fox, then attacking Kerry (who is a war hero) makes you, what? A terrorist? lol
fauxnews - June 5, 2014, 10:57 pm
There you go again... so instead of attacking the poster, you attack (full of rage) the author. Can't refute the poster so go after the source, eh? According to your logic, Fox, then attacking Kerry (who is a war hero) makes you, what? A terrorist? lol
foxrecon19d - June 5, 2014, 10:49 pm
Since a liberal, not a conservative, made this poster, this is obviously how liberals see Obama.
Bandit5906 - June 5, 2014, 10:32 pm
The Democrap Party: Founders of the KKK!
foxrecon19d - June 5, 2014, 1:30 pm
The Democrat Party everybody.... Nothing like lynching a black man then blaming others

LAZY LIBERAL'S RESPONCE - 1. Switch the Words "Liberal" and "Conservative" 2. Replace the words "Bush" "Racist" and "Run" with "Obama" "Traitor" and "Fire" 3. The girl should stay, she looks like Palin.....

TAGS: obama liberal bush conserative deomcrat
Rating: 4.5/5

More politifakes by jrae081

JGalt - October 3, 2012, 11:32 pm
crankyhead - October 3, 2012, 8:43 pm
'Fire' LOL. Good one.



TAGS: democrats destroy america s defense
Rating: 4.48/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

Curlyrocks - August 1, 2013, 4:23 pm
Ya well any one who though the sequester would affect the mega contractors is an idiot. They figure these guys are already taking a hit for the rich they can handle another, bastards.

INTERNET LIBERALS - Please show our internet liberal haters some respect. They only lash out at you because they know you are better than them.

TAGS: great being right and conservative
Rating: 4.43/5

More politifakes by WTFO

RonaldReagan - April 5, 2015, 3:37 am
Now I can relate. A keeper. Putting this on my wall as a reminder to, Just say NO

GEORGE H.W. BUSH - Read my lips: No new taxes... psyche!

REPUBLICAN SUICIDE - It makes no sense that Henry Hamilton of Key West, Florida, committed suicide just because of Obama's re-election.

TAGS: conservative republican suicide obama election
Rating: 2.09/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - April 14, 2015, 4:05 pm
That he was.
RonaldReagan - April 12, 2015, 10:55 pm

IDIOCRACY - It's closer than you think.

THIS IS SPARTA - When GrouchoMarxist asked if Leonidas spit or swallow, he answered with a gigantic kick in the balls.

These Lives Matter -

DEFENSE CUTS - Hope your entitlements and social reform spending were worth it.

BENITO MUSSOLINI - "Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power."

CONSERVATIVES AND LIBERALS - They're All full of Shit !

ENVY - He's handsome, wealthy, successful, a family man. It's not difficult to understand why liberals hate Mitt Romney so much.


ELECTIONS ARE NOT POPULARITY CONTESTS - they have serious consequences


CONSERVATIVE WOMEN - Exercising 2nd Amendment Rights at their monthly NRA Ladies Auxiliary meeting. (Women + Guns = Sexy)

HERMAN CAIN - Black conservative and not ashamed.

STAND YOUR GROUND - For some reason, "Stand Your Ground" doesn't apply if you actually are trying to defend yourself from harm. Go figure.

CLASS WARFARE CONSERVATIVE STYLE - The worker making $7.25 an hour is paid too much. While the CEO making millions a year is paying way too much in Taxes.

HEY LIBERALS - how else may I piss you off today


THE HYPOCRITIC OATH - Millionaire governor Rick Scott fights health care for all Americans but pays only $800 a year for his own government-supplied health care.

FAIRNESS? - That sounds like socialism!

THE MOST INTERESTING MAN IN THE WORLD - I now want to marry him and have his babies.

TAGS: dosxx foxbashing stupid conservatives
Rating: 1.86/5

More politifakes by MysteriousWoman5150

JGalt - November 6, 2012, 6:50 am
Truth bothers you that much, eh?

Consensus, Models & Predictions vs. REALITY -

TAGS: global warming myth hoax climate change scam green energy farce consensus models predictions reality ipcc al gore greenies alarmists warmists
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 4, 2015, 12:39 pm
Here's a possible explaination, http://www.cato.org/blog/you-ought-have-look-climate-sensitivity-environmental-worries-are-trending-downward

ZOMBIE REAGAN - Still more conservative than the GOP...I'd vote for him.

Mia Love -

TAGS: mi love utah war on women black conservative conservative woman
Rating: 4.79/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

blesic - December 2, 2014, 11:36 pm
She must be a Mormon otherwise she wouldn't have been elected.

LEMME GET THIS STRAIGHT - The economic system we used to become the richest, most powerful, most pampered nation on the planet - And you're telling us it doesn't work???

PROHIBTION - Conservatives and liberals are wrong. Libertarians are right!


GUN CONTROL - Is The Gipper a tyrant for supporting very conservative legislation regulating the sales of firearms?

TAGS: gun control ronald reagan conservative
Rating: 3.4/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - January 18, 2013, 10:03 am
Worse: they'd call Reagan a LIBRUL!
PapaFox - January 18, 2013, 9:32 am
Today they'd call him a RINO. :(

JOB CREATORS - Where are those jobs? You had your tax cuts for over a decade now!!

TEABAGGERS - They sling the word socialist much like chimpanzees fling their own feces.

Second Amendment -

TAGS: guns jesus violence republican conservative
Rating: 2.33/5

More politifakes by blesic

blesic - September 21, 2014, 9:42 pm
Concisely put.
Bandit5906 - September 21, 2014, 9:02 pm
Of course! What good would a gun be (for defense) if he could not use it responsibly?

CONSERVATIVES - So closed-minded, that nothing sinks in at all, not even the facts.

TAGS: conservative republican teabaggers stupid fascists
Rating: 2.2/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Renza - March 15, 2013, 7:46 am
Of course they are, even if managed to grasp the facts, they couldn't do anything about it... admitting they're arguing about the validity of fictional things would just make them look stupid...
PapaFox - March 14, 2013, 6:12 am
Facts are the enemy!

WE'RE COMING... - In November, 2012

PROFIT MOTIVE - Jonas Salk did not care about it.

LIBERTARIANISM - Anarchy for rich people.

THE TEA PARTY - Give us what we want or we'll burn the country down.

YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS STUFF UP - John McCain “Doesn’t Understand” Torture - Rick Santorum

POLITICS OVER ADVANCEMENT - The NAACP refuses to back Kenneth Gladney after he was beaten down and called Nigger because Gladney is a Conservative.


CONSERVATIVES - Proud to be everything liberals can't stand



Grumpy Cat Hates Faux News -

MORON - Republicans sure know one when they see one. And sometimes, they elect one, too.

TAGS: rick perry stupid conservative republican
Rating: 1.5/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - July 5, 2013, 10:55 am
And yet, I am still cogent enough to type a cogent sentence.
Cannabal - July 5, 2013, 10:52 am
I was with you right up until that last part there, because, as Coulter herself has pointed out, Obama is only "half-black."
ChadAllen - July 4, 2013, 11:40 pm
But I agree with you tho' about Cannonball. Him & ol' Pops both need to lay off that loco weed & clear the smoke outta their attic's.
ChadAllen - July 4, 2013, 11:32 pm
Personally, I think both of these self-serving Parties need to die a grisly death. Neither one's worth a Rats $hit to the people.
ChadAllen - July 4, 2013, 11:31 pm
Bush is going on 5 years down the road. Time to man up & get with this program we've got now. A much more demonstrable one given this enemy of the state we have now virtually gets away with murder & believes he can simply by virtue of his being black!
Cannabal - July 3, 2013, 6:37 pm
If only Bush had a teleprompter: he could've sounded, uh, not stupid.
Cannabal - July 3, 2013, 6:36 pm
That's not true: because I still think Rick Perry is woefully retarded.
OTC - July 3, 2013, 5:51 pm
Now Chad, there were plenty of Republicans that were bamboozled and voted for obama, he just got the wrong picture, cannabal probably smokes too much cannabis
ChadAllen - July 3, 2013, 3:32 pm
What? Nothing about the abject idiot & thorough failure Democrats gave us as their candidate for President?? Moron.

Philosophy -

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES - Brain sold separately.

Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -

TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)

Congratulations to Senator Tim Scott -

YOU CAN DRESS UP A TURD - But At The End Of The Day, It's Still A Turd

CITIZENS UNITED - Because money is free speech and our Politicians weren't corrupt enough.

CONSERVATIVE WOMEN - You don't stand a chance with her dude she's beautiful and smarter than you

Pro-self defense does NOT mean pro-murder. -

TAGS: pro life murder self defense hobby lobby
Rating: 3.76/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

EmmaRoydes - July 15, 2014, 11:07 pm
That's a non sequitar. The intention of self-defense is not to kill someone. The intention of abortion IS to kill someone.


Don't blame me for my politics. -

TAGS: tea party conservatives bible homophobia
Rating: 3.4/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Zeitguy - July 14, 2014, 10:28 am
The power of the biblical force field.

American Conservatives are Pro-life * -

TAGS: american conservatives pro life trayon martin
Rating: 3.24/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - July 7, 2014, 6:02 pm
Oh, Zeity, you had me at "score." :-)
Zeitguy - July 7, 2014, 5:17 pm
Score one for Emma for the KKK democrat retort.
fauxnews - July 7, 2014, 5:02 pm
Here's a towel then. Feel better? Now dry off those tears, mate. :-)
EmmaRoydes - July 7, 2014, 4:37 pm
No thanks, maybe you should just take a cold shower.
fauxnews - July 7, 2014, 4:24 pm
fauxnews - July 7, 2014, 4:24 pm
Need a hug?
EmmaRoydes - July 7, 2014, 3:57 pm
Funny how you show a democrat (KKK) aiming a pistol at the child. Being a limey, you probably didn't know that the KKK is a product of democrats, did you?
fauxnews - July 7, 2014, 1:30 pm
Seriously, though... all satire has a component built into that. In the meanwhile, watch Fruitvale station. Great empathy exercise. http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20483133_20687823,00.html
fauxnews - July 7, 2014, 1:27 pm
Like the Stallone movie? X-D http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_UC2AyhYQk
Zeitguy - July 7, 2014, 1:25 pm
Kinda going over the top a bit wouldn't you say.

LIBERALS; - Stop blaming everyone for your issues and take responsibility for your life. I know, taking responsibility for anything is hard for you, but I believe...


CONSERVATIVE RE-WRITE - Not so attractive as the original.

TAGS: conservative values
Rating: 2.78/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - February 27, 2013, 5:52 pm
There's a pretty clear difference between a satirical presentation of religion being used, and the actual bastardization that politicians like to use, of which the satire is meant to point out.
PapaFox - February 27, 2013, 1:49 pm
You wouldn't be the first I've seen do just that. Hell, you wouldn't be the first I've seen even today.
falconfan00 - February 27, 2013, 1:17 pm
C'mon man. Your cold busted doing the very thing you accuse the other side of being wrong about, and there's supposed to be some justification for that? You can use Jesus but I can't? What if i say all my religious posts are protests, can i do it then?
PapaFox - February 27, 2013, 12:52 pm
In a protest over the way religion is often mis-used on the right.
falconfan00 - February 27, 2013, 12:32 pm
I believe you Papa and i agree with you. But i will remind you that you used Christ and scripture in this very post for political reasons. You did the very thing you have a problem with the other guy doing, using Jesus to sell your politics.
PapaFox - February 27, 2013, 10:16 am
I have no problem with religion, being a believer myself. I DO have a problem with the way it's often abused for political reasons or filling televangelist's pockets.
falconfan00 - February 27, 2013, 10:05 am
Since you appear unaware, please refer to large picture of Jesus along with modified scripture from the Bible to determine who brought up religion. That would be the original poster, not yours truly. To imply I brought it up would be error on your part.
Renza - February 27, 2013, 8:32 am
If people didn't bring up religion, they probably wouldn't get related responses, often how things work. Anyone's welcome to state their opinion, it may just be responded to with facts.
falconfan00 - February 26, 2013, 4:21 pm
Nice jab at the Christian. It must be great to know you can be as inconsiderate as you like to someone knowing that if they return the favor, you can point at them and call them hypocrits for coming down to your level. Stay classy Ren.
Renza - February 26, 2013, 4:17 pm
An imaginary figure can't save a country, fyi. You may also wish to consider broadening your views of government and charity. Just because helping the poor isn't their sole purpose doesn't mean they don't do it.
PapaFox - February 26, 2013, 3:33 pm
If you prefer to remain ignorant of our country's history, knock yourself out.
falconfan00 - February 26, 2013, 3:10 pm
So the government, by your definition, is a charity?? And charities have armies? Conduct foreign policy? Run agencies like the CIA and FBI? Build interstates? Run prisons? Or, most importantly, force donations under penalty of law?? Wow dude.
PapaFox - February 26, 2013, 2:54 pm
Wrong. The US Government has been helping the poor since the country was formed. http://www.welfareinfo.org/history/
falconfan00 - February 26, 2013, 2:48 pm
Government is not a charitable institution, no matter how hard you try to make it so. At its best it is inefficient, and at its worst it is the prime example for corruption and greed. If government equaled charity, Christ would have come to save Rome.

FASCISTS - Sound eerily like Teabaggers.

AND THE ANSWER IS...... - Zero!

Both sides are just as stupid as each other. The one thing that conservatards and libtards can agree upon, but are too dense to see it. That's why they are the same bad thing and don't see the irony. -

TAGS: conservatards libtards
Rating: 2.14/5

More politifakes by CthulthuDownUnder

EmmaRoydes - August 17, 2014, 2:59 pm
As I said, cth... the site isn't about you, just take the ego down a notch or two and the site gets easier for you to stomach without getting indigestion or continue as is, that's your issue to resolve, not mine. Have a wonderful day.
EmmaRoydes - August 17, 2014, 2:57 pm
Most definitely moo, the unnamed shall remain unnamed henceforth.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 17, 2014, 2:48 pm

Emma, I don't know if you got the memo. But I have asked that "he who shall not be named" not be name anymore. Thank you in advance for not bringing him up anymore.
CthulthuDownUnder - August 17, 2014, 2:46 pm
when a person known for talking smack decides to talk smack,you cant expect someone NOT to respond.you do realise thats not how arguing works,right? if you dont want this site to be about me,then dont make it about me with your insecurity. PROBLEM SOLVED
CthulthuDownUnder - August 17, 2014, 2:41 pm
who you kidding?add liar to your resume.typical. POINT: i made a poster you dont like, you passively aggressively attack; a habit you're apparently in with many. when you finally wake up TO YOURSELF you will figure it out; regarding "ego": your projecting
EmmaRoydes - August 17, 2014, 2:11 pm
Nobody called you vbbataile. I was nudging vicky (who I a**ume is still reading posts on this site), not you. Take the ego down a notch, this site isn't all about you.
CthulthuDownUnder - August 17, 2014, 1:43 pm
Had gotten your message. Thank you :)
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 17, 2014, 5:49 am

Check your inbox.
CthulthuDownUnder - August 16, 2014, 9:54 pm
to the rest of you: notice how I try to stay clear of these comment pages. don't like my posters? give it a 1 point OR attack the poster,not me. or dont look at them.PROBLEM SOLVED.but don't attack me and expect me NOT TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT IT. cowards..
CthulthuDownUnder - August 16, 2014, 9:15 pm
did I wander into conservapedia by accident???? if you want to attack my poster. go for it. calling me a troll because I made a poster? why don't you wake up to yourself. if this place is a conservatroll country club, someone tell me and I'll leave now
CthulthuDownUnder - August 16, 2014, 8:55 pm
someone calls me "Vbattaile".you say nothing. conservatrolls endlessly harass and attack me.the most you say is "cut it out." I suddenly speak up for myself after I've been called names and you threaten to give me a few days off? do it then. you're a joke
Mooooooooooooooooooo - August 16, 2014, 8:45 pm

Did I not make myself clear earlier? Cut out the name calling or I'll give you a few days off to reread the rules.
CthulthuDownUnder - August 16, 2014, 8:38 pm
you're like the loser school bully who picks on the r etarded kids, why can't you go to reddit or somewhere else you can have a circlejerk with other closed minded tools who agree with you on everything? at least be witty. viciousness doesn't equal humor
CthulthuDownUnder - August 16, 2014, 8:36 pm
I havent seen you express a single opinion of your own,all i have seen you do is attack others for expressing theirs. you take no interest in discussion, and the main thing you do here is aggressively attack and suppress opinions which differ from yours
CthulthuDownUnder - August 16, 2014, 8:35 pm
why is it that every time i read one of your posts, i get the impression that you're nothing but a giant ball of hate and passive aggression? seriously,what the f*** happened to you that has made you this bitter and obnoxious?
EmmaRoydes - August 16, 2014, 8:13 pm
It's even funnier when he uses democrats (westboro) incorrectly to attack conservatives. Why, I think he just b1tch slapped himself.
Cyberhagen - August 16, 2014, 7:33 pm
Did he just seriously compare the Westboro Baptists losers to all conservatives? This is just poor trolling at this point. Iv'e seen better trolls under bridges.
foxrecon19d - August 15, 2014, 11:51 pm
Funny isn't it? When a left-wing liberal cannot defend his own position, all of a sudden he says BOTH liberals AND conservatives are stupid... Then the left-wing liberal claims not be a left-wing liberal. Watch and learn...
foxrecon19d - August 15, 2014, 11:48 pm
***snicker***heh..heh...heh...ha...ha...ha... AHH!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA! Ladies and gentleman! Let's give a standing ovation to the left-wing liberal who just presented the VERY BEST EVIDENCE that liberals can produce supporting Global Warming! CLAP! CLAP! CLAP

WHITE NATIONALISM - The true foundation of Nazism. And at the current time, it is also the key demographic of the Republican Party.

TAGS: conservative republican nazi fascist party
Rating: 2/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - November 15, 2012, 2:20 pm
Yeah, U.S. ain't made much progress in terms of race relations.
arnnatz - November 15, 2012, 9:49 am
By the same token, obama received 93% of the black vote.
Cannabal - November 15, 2012, 8:39 am
Yes, but it's gonna be hard to do that when the GOP received 88% of the white vote. And let's not forget that the previous ticket was was also two very white guys.
PapaFox - November 15, 2012, 7:57 am
Scary but true. The Republican Party needs to steer away from the loons and get back to representing the rest of America.

Joni Ernst -

TAGS: conservative republican senate women feminism
Rating: 1.93/5

More politifakes by blesic

blesic - November 12, 2014, 12:10 pm
That's right. Both global climate change and religion have been accepted as fact.
jonny5 - November 12, 2014, 9:59 am
The argument that consensus confirms "man made global climate change" proves your point. Conversely religion's been around for centuries, so by the same logic as fewer and fewer believe that proves that it never was a myth and therefore must be 100% true
blesic - November 11, 2014, 11:55 am
If a myth endures long enough, it becomes accepted as fact.
jonny5 - November 10, 2014, 9:38 am
and the myth of liberal tolerance rolls on...
blesic - November 9, 2014, 3:19 pm
Yes, ban him! Definitely ban Johnny.
jonny5 - November 9, 2014, 11:31 am
blesic stands for "Believes Liberalism Enthusiastically Stereotypical Insensitive Caveman" If a Rep had written this they'd be tagged ***ist and the those on the left would call for their being banned.
blesic - November 8, 2014, 8:56 pm
Thank you.
Cannabal - November 8, 2014, 7:28 pm
blesic, you're all right.
blesic - November 8, 2014, 4:27 pm
At least I'm not a conservative buffoon. That's the lowest form of animal life in the country.
blesic - November 8, 2014, 4:27 pm
At least I'm not a conservative buffoon. That's the lowest form of animal life in the country.
diehard - November 8, 2014, 1:07 am
get a grip, get a life..wake up and welcome to 2014....what a buffoon
blesic - November 8, 2014, 12:14 am
Certainly not! This is 1961. Isn't it?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 7, 2014, 7:18 pm

"know their place" Are you stuck in the 1950's?
blesic - November 7, 2014, 2:05 pm
They should have income equality as long as they know their place.
diehard - November 7, 2014, 5:27 am
Still better than liberal douches who fail at both jobs
OTC - November 7, 2014, 2:15 am
Guess Hillary Clinton should stay out of the political race in 2016 with all these attacks on women by the left, cause y'know, war on women and all
OTC - November 7, 2014, 2:11 am
And here I was believing liberals wanted income equality and equal rights for women
blesic - November 7, 2014, 12:21 am
If she's in the national guard, it must be KP duty.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - November 6, 2014, 10:05 pm

Well put.
Olympusmanager - November 6, 2014, 9:54 pm
You know that you're talking about a Lt. Colonel in the National Guard, right? Why don't you enlighten the rest of us as to YOUR accomplishments, as soon as YOU finish the dishes. What a DERP!

MODERN REPUBLICAN - "It's COMMUNIST because I said so! (Even though I don't know what that word really means......)

Fear -

TAGS: conservative republican guns violence feminism
Rating: 1.63/5

More politifakes by blesic

blesic - December 7, 2014, 10:24 pm
Shame on you and the conservatives who hide behind guns and outdated laws like cowards.
Zeitguy - December 7, 2014, 7:38 pm
You sound as if you live in a country that does not have a constitutional amendment that gives you the" right to bear arms". If so then good luck, if not then shame on you.
posterman - November 8, 2014, 8:31 pm
And your interpretation of a liberaldefending themselves with a cell phone; waiting minutes on 911 when second count?



VOTE CONSERVATIVE - Because you don't want HIM picking leaders, do you?



“AFTER MY ELECTION, I HAVE MORE FLEXIBILITY,” - Obama can hardly wait to submissively roll-over on US interests. What other radical moves are planned for the 2nd term?

ANGRY PROTESTERS - Angry conservatives fly the flag and denounce the President. Angry proggs deface the flag and denounce America.

DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. - A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual doom.

LIBERAL MYTH #31 - Liberals are always honest about their agendas during an election.


ECONOMICS EXPLAINED: - Pizza clarifies everything.

OKLAHOMA IS SAVING MONEY - by passing a law that requires all driver's license exams to be printed in English only.


TAGS: common sense
Rating: 4.2/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - May 3, 2013, 4:45 pm
glad you recognize liberals are stupid
ipaprime - May 3, 2013, 7:59 am
last one no clue, but the current one is not over yet.
Renza - April 27, 2013, 2:54 pm
You really should try harder
ipaprime - April 27, 2013, 8:55 am
try http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2012/04/05/3471948.htm
OTC - April 26, 2013, 4:28 pm
Since I don't watch FoxNews, apparently, you watch it more than myself. When you say 'national' and 'we' you weren't talking about America?
crankyhead - April 26, 2013, 1:42 pm
Seriously though, OTC, what caused the START and the END of the last ice age? (What's the matter lil' buddy, question to difficult, or are you just a stupid liberal?)
Renza - April 26, 2013, 7:41 am
yes, two of those words were once I used, the rest is some gibberish you pulled out of some dark hole... like fox news
OTC - April 25, 2013, 9:19 pm
Your words, not mine
Renza - April 25, 2013, 6:12 pm
Your understanding of using a scope of reference is astounding... Either that or your fail trolling... I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and guess the latter.
OTC - April 25, 2013, 4:32 pm
'National scale'. So only Americans are polluters and creating man made climate change, I see.
Renza - April 24, 2013, 6:14 pm
It's a (very) small step in the right direction, but on even a national scale it's minimal. We really should be moving to better fuel sources anyway, viably renewable and eco friendly preferably.
OTC - April 24, 2013, 5:44 pm
So all the liberal efforts to have cleaner burning cars was a failure then
Renza - April 24, 2013, 12:11 pm
The global scientific community seems to disagree with your a***ogy in terms of end result. Obviously it's not something where everyone needs to quickly shut off their cars to save the planet before it implodes next week, but the effects will be tangible
OTC - April 24, 2013, 12:00 pm
Human impact is a drop in the bucket compared to mother natures impact
Renza - April 24, 2013, 9:11 am
As I said in less detail just a few posts up... It's a misconception that the argument is that global climate change (not "global warming" which is an inaccurate name) is entirely man made. The issue is that humans are impacting how it is happening.
OTC - April 24, 2013, 8:54 am
Its just common sense that man was not industrialized 10,000 yrs ago when the earth warmed up ending the Ice Age, so why do liberals think man is causing warming today?
Renza - April 24, 2013, 7:35 am
I personally am not a scientist, unless you're a cynic to the degree of saying all information is bs until you individually prove it, I'm sure the evidence provided by the scientific communities should be sufficient for you.
OTC - April 24, 2013, 12:47 am
Cranky, if you can't understand my previous posts, ask an elementary student to help you
crankyhead - April 23, 2013, 11:35 am
But seriously OTC, what caused the end of the last ice age?
PapaFox - April 22, 2013, 3:21 pm
It seems your determination to remain ignorant is strong. Good luck with that.
OTC - April 22, 2013, 2:53 pm
You admit then that all the liberal efforts with the Clean Air Act to reduce emissions, putting restrictions on vehicles to burn cleaner fuel, banning R-12 freon, that the man made global warming is still increasing. Liberal failure at its best.
OTC - April 22, 2013, 2:48 pm
So you admit it is only human activity that is causing global warming and nothing else, so again, what human activity caused global warming 10,000yrs ago ending the Ice Age, man inventing fire?
OTC - April 22, 2013, 2:31 pm
Renza, do you have proof that if man wasn't on earth, that the rate wouldn't change any slower? Do you know what the tempurature of the earth should be? Maybe the rate of change is approaching the norm
OTC - April 22, 2013, 2:28 pm
Cranky, if you can't understand my previous post, maybe an elemntary student can help you.
Renza - April 21, 2013, 12:20 am
To make sure I'm understanding you correctly, your argument is "la la la, I am not listening, la la la, there's no such thing as global warming nobody knows what they're talking about..."? paraphrased of course.
crankyhead - April 20, 2013, 9:03 pm
Seriously OTC, can you please enlighten the rest of us, please? What caused the end of the last ice age?
OTC - April 20, 2013, 8:23 pm
As if Guardian is a science source, thanks for the hypocrisy. Of course energy and auto industry are scared that the GW hoax will heavily tax them, which they will have to pass onto the consumers
PapaFox - April 20, 2013, 8:06 pm
So you go to a BUSINESS magazine to get information on SCIENCE? Dude, get serious! It's the energy and auto businesses that are the biggest global warming deniers.
OTC - April 20, 2013, 7:48 pm
Here is a reputable source-http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhendrickson/2012/09/16/climate-change-hoax-or-crime-of-the-century/
OTC - April 20, 2013, 7:06 pm
Did you miss #52035?
Renza - April 19, 2013, 9:44 pm
You appear to be misunderstanding the concept as a whole. Climate change will occur naturally, however human impact is impacting how and the rate at which the climate changes.
crankyhead - April 19, 2013, 9:27 pm
Pretty pretty please with a maraschino cherry on top.
crankyhead - April 19, 2013, 9:27 pm
But what caused the end of the last ice age OTC?
OTC - April 19, 2013, 9:26 pm
Liberals such as al gore blame industrial man for global warming to impose a carbon footprint tax. I have enough sense to know its not man made
crankyhead - April 19, 2013, 2:08 pm
Tenacity, my good man, tenacity. =)
Renza - April 19, 2013, 10:11 am
While there is a certain level of truth to that, I've lead many a fundy back upon and against their own arguments and "logic", usually all they do is just get mad and start repeating their talking points as if they were facts and saying your wrong.
crankyhead - April 19, 2013, 8:30 am
...dismantle their own arguments themselves, well, even the most obtuse of people can understand when they are lying to themselves.
crankyhead - April 19, 2013, 8:29 am
See, if OTC wishes to 'play along', he only dismantles his own argument. Which is kind of how you have to go about discussing reality with right wingers. If you dismantle their arguments for them, they never believe you, but if you get them to...
crankyhead - April 19, 2013, 8:26 am
The reason OTC won't answer my question is simple. If he comes up with the correct answer, then he admits that current human activity is having a negative impact on the climate. OTC would rather just call you and me stupid, rather than face facts.
Renza - April 19, 2013, 7:46 am
Is it not a question for a question and an answer for an answer? Give an answer get an answer, give a question, get a question. So evading an answer with a misdirecting question will simply lead back to another question.
OTC - April 19, 2013, 12:45 am
You answer my question with basically my question? Just can't play along, huh?
crankyhead - April 18, 2013, 5:01 pm
... then not being able to explain it yourself, would be as good a place to start as any, no?
crankyhead - April 18, 2013, 5:00 pm
So, OTC, can you or can't you explain it to us? I said please after all. Or, by not explaining it, is that just your way of telling us that you are going to start self-identifying as a liberal? I mean, if liberals can't explain global warming...
OTC - April 18, 2013, 4:43 pm
Apparently, you don't understand your comment to the question
crankyhead - April 18, 2013, 4:07 pm
OTC? Can you explain to us, what caused the end of the last ice age, please?
Renza - April 18, 2013, 2:09 pm
Al Gore is nothing more than an advocate... I can understand why you would feel he's considered a part of it given his a**ociation, but that's really like saying the westboro baptist church is the core of the Republicans and Christianity.
PapaFox - April 18, 2013, 11:57 am
Gore is not a scientist, and I've never claimed he was, so please stop telling lies. If you choose to ignore the facts of climate change despite overwhelming evidence, that is of course your choice.
OTC - April 18, 2013, 11:34 am
Al Gore is the front runner about global warming, I asked why liberals can't explain global warming that ended the Ice Age, post #52038 is your answer. So the out spoken liberal explaining global warming is a scientist according to you.
PapaFox - April 18, 2013, 5:50 am
Never said that. Fewer lies please.
OTC - April 18, 2013, 1:02 am
That is my question to liberals
OTC - April 18, 2013, 1:01 am
Papafox said so
StoneTools - April 17, 2013, 7:53 pm
crankyhead - April 17, 2013, 3:48 pm
OTC, there was a problem on the servers here last week, and my question to you got deleted. If it's ok with you, I'll ask it again: OTC, I would like to invite you, to explain to us, what caused the end of the last ice age, please.
Renza - April 17, 2013, 1:41 pm
Who said he was?
OTC - April 17, 2013, 11:42 am
I didn't know Al Gore was a scientist.
PapaFox - April 11, 2013, 11:19 am
Liberals don't. Scientists do. If you're HONESTLY curious, do a little reading on the subject from reputable sources.
OTC - April 11, 2013, 11:06 am
Why can't any liberal explain what caused global warming which ended the Ice Age?
PapaFox - April 11, 2013, 7:42 am
Especially when those facts threaten profits.
Renza - April 11, 2013, 7:34 am
It is always easier to deny the facts than try to understand them.
Rudedog - April 10, 2013, 10:19 pm
What scientists call non refutable evidence, politicians call a hidden agenda.
PapaFox - April 10, 2013, 8:10 pm
Don't be such a sap. Even Exxon admits it now.

REP. ALLEN WEST - "I think that when you look at what a community organizer is turning out to be, it does seem to be like a low-level socialist agitator" Thank you for your courage, honesty and service, sir.

FLORIDA BONG BAN - Are you high, Florida? Your jonesing economy can't rely on the illegal coke trade alone!

AT LEAST ITS NOT VIOLENCE-VIOLENCE - Janet says border violence with Mexico hasn't spilled over in a serious way

DIVERSITY - In a spirit of diversity, a person's culture should be respected, unless of course, your culture includes traditional American Conservative values.

TELEVISION - It has no liberal or conservative bias: there is only static to confuse you, to distract you, and to stupefy you.


AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE VALUES - Republicans, Religion and Guns Don't Mix Wished You Had Voted NOW! Don't Ya?


HOW STRANGE - Republicans didn't give a half of a shit about civil liberties when Bush was taking them all away......

TAGS: conservative republicans civil rights liberties
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Doggit - January 17, 2013, 9:40 am
Good point
Cannabal - January 16, 2013, 11:29 pm
Yep, we're f***ed.
JGalt - January 16, 2013, 11:11 pm
And Now democrats do not!

JOHN MOHAMMAD - Zero terrorist attacks on American soil since 9/11?

Conservatives -

TAGS: fox news conservative republican media
Rating: 2.57/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - May 4, 2013, 2:10 am
You posted this link before. That's the problem with you conservatives: lack of nuance.
Cannabal - May 4, 2013, 2:06 am
"...under the right circumstances, conservatives and libertarians were as likely as anyone on the left to give wrong answers to economic questions..." You are so full of ****, Galt. You wanna talk to me about Harvard's bogus austerity paper, too?!
Cannabal - May 4, 2013, 1:54 am
Remind me: who established voodoo economics again? REAGAN!
PapaFox - May 3, 2013, 10:47 pm
Talk to us about trickle-down poverty sometime.
JGalt - May 3, 2013, 10:43 pm
JGalt - May 3, 2013, 10:42 pm
JGalt - May 3, 2013, 10:41 pm
liberals flunk economics tests.... http://h**air.com/archives/2010/06/08/wsj-liberals-fail-economics-test-conservative-and-libertarians-score-best/
Renza - May 3, 2013, 1:28 pm
5L says they'd deny it anyway.